Most Active Stories
- Creative Living E-Newsletter Sign Up
- Michael Feinstein New Year's Eve at the Rainbow Room airs the 31st, at 9 pm
- Christmas with the Mormon Tabernacle Choir airs on Friday, December 19th at 9 pm
- "Elsa's Legacy: The Born Free Story" on Nature, airs the 17th at 7 pm
- Sacred Journeys Pt. 3 and Pt. 4 continue on Tuesday, the 23rd, beginning at 7 pm
Thu March 22, 2012
Was The Saints' Bounty For Injuring Opponents Effective?
Originally published on Wed March 21, 2012 7:13 pm
The NFL has suspended New Orleans Saints coach Sean Payton and his former defensive coordinator over the team's bounty scandal. Saints' players were allegedly paid bonuses for injuring opponents — the more serious the injury, the bigger the bounty.
As NPR sports correspondent Mike Pesca explained to us on last week's podcast, players received $1,000 for delivering a hit to an opponent that got them carted off the field and $1,500 if the opponent was knocked out of the game and could not return.
The suspensions show the NFL has decided this behavior was clearly wrong.
But there's a separate question that's worth asking here, if only for the sake of discussion: Did the bounties work? Were they an effective incentive?
Maybe not, according to Pesca.
"It worked in that the Saints did make the Super Bowl, and the fact they put a licking on Brett Favre factored into that," Pesca told us.
But, Pesca said, most football minds would agree that the Saints' defense was generally too aggressive. And the bounties may have contributed to that. They may have created an incentive for Saints defenders to take too many risks in pursuit of the big hit.
"Last year the Saints blitzed way too often and tried to be way too fast, aggressive and nasty," Pesca said. "It burned them."